19 2 / 2012

via fuckyeahthelastframe:

Straw Dogs, 1971 (Sam Peckinpah)

via fuckyeahthelastframe:

Straw Dogs, 1971 (Sam Peckinpah)

Permalink 9 notes

12 2 / 2012


Here’s hoping that there are videos of Francis Ford Coppola in Hearts of Darkness, getting the same treatment.

31 1 / 2012

Transcript
UNIVERSAL-INTERNATIONAL PICTURES
UNIVERSAL CITY, CALIFORNIA

February 9, 1960

Dear Mr. Bergman,

You have most certainly received enough acclaim and success throughout the world to make this note quite unnecessary. But for whatever it’s worth, I should like to add my praise and gratitude as a fellow director for the unearthly and brilliant contribution you have made to the world by your films (I have never been in Sweden and have therefore never had the pleasure of seeing your theater work). Your vision of life has moved me deeply, much more deeply than I have ever been moved by any films. I believe you are the greatest film-maker at work today. Beyond that, allow me to say you are unsurpassed by anyone in the creation of mood and atmosphere, the subtlety of performance, the avoidance of the obvious, the truthfullness and completeness of characterization. To this one must also add everything else that goes into the making of a film. I believe you are blessed with wonderfull actors. Max von Sydow and Ingrid Thulin live vividly in my memory, and there are many others in your acting company whose names escape me. I wish you and all of them the very best of luck, and I shall look forward with eagerness to each of your films.

Best Regards,

(Signed, ‘Stanley Kubrick’)

Stanley Kubrick

(via Letters of Note)


Transcript UNIVERSAL-INTERNATIONAL PICTURES UNIVERSAL CITY, CALIFORNIA

February 9, 1960

Dear Mr. Bergman,

You have most certainly received enough acclaim and success throughout the world to make this note quite unnecessary. But for whatever it’s worth, I should like to add my praise and gratitude as a fellow director for the unearthly and brilliant contribution you have made to the world by your films (I have never been in Sweden and have therefore never had the pleasure of seeing your theater work). Your vision of life has moved me deeply, much more deeply than I have ever been moved by any films. I believe you are the greatest film-maker at work today. Beyond that, allow me to say you are unsurpassed by anyone in the creation of mood and atmosphere, the subtlety of performance, the avoidance of the obvious, the truthfullness and completeness of characterization. To this one must also add everything else that goes into the making of a film. I believe you are blessed with wonderfull actors. Max von Sydow and Ingrid Thulin live vividly in my memory, and there are many others in your acting company whose names escape me. I wish you and all of them the very best of luck, and I shall look forward with eagerness to each of your films.

Best Regards,

(Signed, ‘Stanley Kubrick’)

Stanley Kubrick


(via Letters of Note)

31 1 / 2012

12 1 / 2012

Primer


When El Mariachi was originally released no one believed that someone could make a film for $7,000 dollars. It seemedinsane. Then a couple of years later, The Blair Witch Project comes out and does the kind of box office business that Hollywood films like Death to Smoochy wish they could have had. That witch changed everything.

There was a flood of movie made on no budgets at all, and plenty of them got some attention. The problem was that a lot of them weren’t any good.

The problem with the “independent” film world is people max out their credit cards by trying to make films that look just as good as Hollywood movies, or have characters that have sellable character arcs, redeemable social messages, Syd Field 101. Because when you make a movie in your early twenties you hope and pray that not only that someone will see, love and subsequently buy and distribute your movie — but that the people that do buy your movie at least have a reserved parking space at one of the major studios.

So, to make a movie for 7k about a group of engineers who build a time machine and become involved in a complex narrative riddle, with no notable visual effects, recognizable actors — or for that matter actors with any previous experience! — is just plain nutty.

But, Primer is as smart and as clever as anything that has come out of Hollywood for a long time. It was made by an engineer who had no previous film experience, who was literally self taught, and who not only delivered a brilliant narrative film but also one that had a clear and cohesive visual look and deceptively simple characters.

Primer is a step into a direction of filmmaking that I think we should all embrace, because aside from the accounting wonders, it is a film filled with amazing stuff. Usually when you watch sci-fi films there tends to be a lot of dumbing down of technical jargon. Primer embraces it. Because it doesn’t really matter what the exact terms mean, because we are shown those theories and put into practice. When we watch two mechanics work over a car and discuss the job to be done, it’s not so much what they’re saying but what they’re doing. We tend to listen with half an ear.

The film also deals with it’s audience in away that’s very different. Remember The Matrix? That movie’s ideas was hammered into our heads scene after scene, because it’s really important for everyone in the audience to stay with the movie in order for it to pay off at the end. It’s gotta be one of the first rules of screenwriting; don’t alienate you audience. But Primer doesn’t really seem to give a shit whether you’re with it or not. It’s on a path, and it will not deviate from that path to explain theories of causality. For viewers that are unprepared that can be a very jarring experience. But it also results in a movie that is lean and free of the narrative fat that clogs up the pace of a lot of movies.

While Primer is not the date movie of the decade it does definitely require you to watch it with someone else if for no other reason than to see how they interpret the events in the movie. I’ve shown the movie to a few people and their observations of the event seem to differ greatly.

By the end you’ll wonder if Doc Brown really needed a DeLorean with a Flex Capacitor after all.


Data:

Primer

Release Date: October 8, 2004
Director: Shane Caruth
Writer: Shane Caruth
Director of Photography: Shane Caruth
Running Time: 77 minutes or 1 hour 17 minutes

Buy | Rent | wikipedia entry

12 1 / 2012

via claytoncubitt:


This song was on the soundtrack to Pleasantville, an adorable but somewhat forgettable movie. The highlight of the film being the near saccharine sweet idea of a black and white world being introduced the variety and multitudes of choice/color.

Paul Thomas Anderson’s music video pulls off a few feats worth noting. A constantly flowing camera that flows between the contexts of the film and the pop charm of Fiona Apple. You get the joy of seeing Apple in the way that PTA probably saw her; coy, alluring, whimsical and wholly indifferent to a male world of violence tearing itself apart.

It’s also worth noting that this is yet another collaboration between PTA and his long-time Director of Photography Robert Elswitt, who would go on to shoot Punch-Drunk Love and Magnolia.

(Source: youtube.com)

06 1 / 2012

(via Gavin Rothery - Directing - Concept - VFX - Gavin Rothery Blog - Nice to meet you Mrs Deckard)


  Here’s an image that didn’t get into any of the cuts of Blade Runner which features imagery of Mr & Mrs Deckard hanging out on the porch of their house. Wierd eh? It’s about as un Blade-Runnery as you could get.

(via Gavin Rothery - Directing - Concept - VFX - Gavin Rothery Blog - Nice to meet you Mrs Deckard)

Here’s an image that didn’t get into any of the cuts of Blade Runner which features imagery of Mr & Mrs Deckard hanging out on the porch of their house. Wierd eh? It’s about as un Blade-Runnery as you could get.

06 1 / 2012